Category Archives: Tests

Post 1754 Marriage Registers

Post 1754 Marriage Registers

Post 1754 marriage registers, what can be gleaned from them?

Following Hardwick’s Marriage Act, the year 1754 saw the introduction of a pre-printed register for marriages.
From this date all marriages had to be by Banns or licence and take place in a consecrated building (up until 1837).
The only exceptions to this were Jewish and Quaker marriages.

    • A requirement for banns of marriage was introduced to England and Wales by the Church in 1215. However a failure to call Banns did not invalidate a marriage.
    • Marriage licenses were introduced in the 14th century, to allow the usual notice period under banns to be waived, on payment of a fee and accompanied by a sworn declaration, that there was no canonical impediment to the marriage.
    • Licenses were usually granted by an archbishop, bishop or archdeacon and such documents would be kept in the parish chest
    • There could be a number of reasons for a couple to obtain a license: they might wish to marry quickly, they might wish to marry in a parish away from their home parish or because a license required payment, they might use this to show their social status.
    • There were two kinds of marriage licenses that could be issued: the usual was known as a common license and named one or two parishes where the wedding could take place, within the jurisdiction of the person who issued the license.
    • The other was the special license, which could only be granted by the Archbishop of Canterbury or his officials and allowed the marriage to take place in any church.

1754 marriage act

To obtain a marriage license, the couple or more usually the bridegroom, had to swear that there was no just cause or impediment why they should not marry.
This was the marriage allegation.

    • A bond was also lodged with the church authorities for a sum of money to be paid if it turned out that the marriage was contrary to Canon Law.
    • The bishop kept the allegation and bond and issued the license to the groom, who then gave it to the vicar of the church, where they were to get married.
    • There was no obligation, for the vicar to keep the license and many were simply destroyed.
    • Hence, few historical examples of marriage licenses, in England and Wales, survive.
    • However, the allegations and bonds were usually retained and are an important source for English genealogy.

Most marriages at this time were by Banns.

    • Banns had to be read on three consecutive Sundays in the parishes of both the bride and the groom so that any objections to the marriage could be made, i.e that either of the couple was a minor, siblings or already married. It was assumed that people who lived close to them would know them best!
    • These Banns were then entered into a register, sometimes separate, sometimes a combined Banns and marriage register.
    • The marriage would then take place in one of these parishes.

Some recording problems may arise here in the parish where the marriage did not take place, a combined register may have the name of the proposed bride and groom and then the recorder has entered the details of another couple in the marriage section.

So what to look out for in Banns or licence documents?

An example of a Banns Document post 1754

The red arrow indicates the parish for the groom. The marriage for these two had been hard to pin down before finding the Banns because the marriage had taken place not in London but in Barbados, so it proved very useful.

Check both parishes for the marriage. You may have thought the couple were both from the same parish, the Banns notice will confirm or deny this and the two parishes can be checked for a marriage.

The marriage record itself, gave the name of the bride and groom, their status, spinster, bachelor, widowed, the date, incumbent, signatures and witnesses.

Witnesses are useful for giving hints at other family connections which may not have been previously known about.

John Wilkinson Ironmaster

John Wilkinson Ironmaster

John Wilkinson was the ‘Ironmaster’ of the industrial revolution Iron ┬áran through the veins of John Wilkinson, who was fortunate enough to be born into the heart of the industrial revolution, both literally and figuratively. He was born in 1728, the son of Isaac Wilkinson. He worked in the iron industry at a blast furnace…

George Duke of Clarence

George Duke of Clarence

George Duke of Clarence may have been the only legitimate heir in the House of York he married the Kingmaker’s daughter what happened to their children? Margaret of York, Edward Plantagenet and Richard of York were born to rank and privilege but how would their lives stand-up to the brutal times of the War of the Roses?

Secrets of Great British Castles

Secrets of Great British Castles

Great British Castles kicks-off in Episode 1 narrated and presented by Dan Jones, there are some intriguing connections to explore but see the flyover video and you will see the series looks set to provide some insights to some impressive historic fortresses. Catch our links to Dover and its historical context but whatever you do don’t miss the series.

Appeasement as Pragmatic Policy

Appeasement as Pragmatic Policy

Appeasement Policy, why did it have any credibility in Neville Chamberlain’s eyes? Could he really believe Hitler wanted peace and when it did unravel was he really surprised and ill-prepared? Would Churchill have handled this period any better and with the position Britain found itself in at that particular point could Churchill really have fared any better by outright confrontation before 3rd Sept 1939?

Neville Chamberlain Prime Minister

Neville Chamberlain Prime Minister

Neville Chamberlain made an error of judgement it is offten argued in seeking a path of appeasement and in particular by seeking to sacrifice other smaller countries in negotiations with Hitler i order to seek to avoid entangling Britain in a further costly war both in human and economic terms that it was currently ill-equipped to fight whilst still recovering from WW1 and the difficult period between the wars that had been book-ended by the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 and the Depression of the early 1930s. In this series we ask questions of wider Britain and its easy criticism of Chamberlain, who was damned for a short period of a career that had largely bee dedicated to public service. But was he individually to blame or part of a wider political history of Britain which wrongly and rashly seeks to attribute blame to a single man, even the Prime Minister. The outcome of war with Hitler may not have changed irrespective of Chamberlain’s actions but would we have been better prepared and avoided some of the early errors in WW2 when Britain as a nation was so ill-prepared for war?

Parliament Act 1911

Parliament Act 1911

The Barons finally give way to democracy and yield their right of veto against democratically approved laws voted on and approved in the House of Commons. An Act of Parliament settles a bitter dispute from the 1909 Peoples Budget and a vital principle that had taken hundreds of years to establish.

Arthur James Balfour Prime Minister 1902-1905

Arthur James Balfour Prime Minister 1902-1905

Arthur James Balfour was a Prime Minister cut from the old aristocratic mould, an intelligent man who perhaps lacked emotional intelligence to match. Educated at Eton and Cambridge, nephew of Lord Salisbury, his mother’s brother. He would serve in coalition during WWI alongside Lloyd George more than strange bed-fellows. It was then that his now infamous Balfour Declaration would be declared and continues to cited as the root cause of the troubles between the Arab and Zionist causes in Palestine. and modern Israel. Unsuccessful Prime Ministers can be even more important it would seem than those that succeed and the failures may also be greatest when they are no longer in the top job.

Constitutional Crisis People’s Budget 1909

Constitutional Crisis People’s Budget 1909

What would cause a king to contemplate the end of the Monarchy and that his son might be the last King? When his Barons, the Lords would rise-up and revolt against the rule of democracy and seek to reinvent the will of the people via its commons from being fulfilled. Lloyd George and Winston Churchill would be the advocates for the poor and common man. Asquith would seek to calm the rage and the King would plead with the Lords to let the Bill pass but it would take two General Elections and never again would this unwritten convention be relied upon without statute to support it.